|
|
Post by Roxology on Sept 4, 2008 14:11:53 GMT -5
You jerk i didnt write thingys, here i am thinking I'm crazy!
|
|
Salvation
Active Member
Arbitrator
Posts: 183
|
Post by Salvation on Sept 4, 2008 14:43:55 GMT -5
haha don't blame me, the board replaced whatever you wrote, hence "board censorship."
|
|
Salvation
Active Member
Arbitrator
Posts: 183
|
Post by Salvation on Sept 4, 2008 14:58:13 GMT -5
Yes, I'm posting a lot today / lately (discovered I can get on at work, and it's been slow)
a foreseeable and very real issue had occurred to me with the rolling dkp system in the event of a non dkp member in the raid:
Wigfield drops, 8 of us roll, potential loss of 130 dkp points to the roll winner (50 for the lock then 8 x 10). Say I /roll and win but only have 120 dkp. Do we dare enter negative amounts of accumulated dkp for this special case? Or If I'm then not permitted to win, the absence of my roll would put the dkp cost within affordability which could obviously cause some disappointment.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dookz on Sept 4, 2008 15:01:53 GMT -5
I like the Solution Serna, and Salv, now you had to go and make it complicated with negative dkp lol. As for the Board Censor, I typed W.H.O.R.E (as in loot) and it replaced it with Sleeper, so I just changed it to SOB lol. One more thing, Salv, keep posting, it usually just me on the boards during the day and i get lonely  |
|
|
|
Post by Roxology on Sept 4, 2008 15:09:05 GMT -5
Actually Sal its quite simple. If everyone is gonna roll, and you dont have enough dkp to fit the equation, you will wind up lose. We will ask ahead of time how many people wish to roll so you can better gauge your dkp.
|
|
|
|
Post by Roxology on Sept 4, 2008 15:09:29 GMT -5
Oh as for what i wrote, apparent d-i-c-k-s can not be written here
|
|
|
|
Post by Dookz on Sept 4, 2008 15:37:09 GMT -5
Oh as for what i wrote, apparent d-i-c-k-s can not be written here roflmfao (aside fron the rof part, i am laughing my arse off) |
|
